The SUV?whether you think it was a great vehicle or a vaunt guzzling monster, rules the road in America. ?The debate everywhere this immensely popular vehicle rages on. To some, the high gasoline phthisis of the vehicle is a symbol of decadent waste. To others, the ample size of the vehicle is a symbol of status and safety? (Kic). What is certain, however, is that the SUV, the dash it is, creates definite economic problems. Many things faecal matter be through to change this, but many automakers feel it is in their outgo interest to not fix those problems.
There is a large gap in the fuel economy between what the bonnie passenger car receives (28 miles per gallon) and what popular SUVs receive (12-16 miles per gallon) (Economics of SUVs). An example of the echt difference this makes would be to consider a driver of a passenger car that receives 28 miles per gallon?a 2005 Chevrolet impala SS fits this category, and a driver of a SUV that receives 15 miles per gallon?a 2005 Chevrolet Tahoe fits this category, that both drive 12,000 miles per year (MSN Auto ). The driver of the impala will travel by $1, 213 a year on gas at $2.83 a gallon . The driver of the SUV will spend $2,264 a year on gas at $2.83 a gallon. This is a difference of $1,050 a year!
I am sure the average consumer can find a ofdecade better way to spend over a cardinal dollars.
Improving fuel economy standards could be done with comparatively low cost compared to the excess amount of money that would be spent on gas. ?Duleep identifies feasible fuel economy improvements that can be made in the upcoming five to ten years and their respective costs. He estimates that average efficiency can...
If you call for to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment