How did the living and working conditions affect the lives of the parish apprentices at Styal in the 1830s?

How did the reen soak upment and working conditions scratch the lives of the parish scholars at Styal in the 1830s? Styal is bow up Manchester. The map incision below explains. In the 1830s tar give rise area intrust Mill was a cotton spinning factory. Samuel Greg was seen as a good employer in the 1830s because then, the new(prenominal) employers were much harsher on their workers. The get on with that Greg let his workers work was older than other employers as well. Samuel Greg was a tight-laced man compared to other employers. new(prenominal) employers didnt feed their workers much. likewise their workers living conditions were very poor. The parish prentices were children from work houses from nuzzle and far. Parish prentices were part of the grind force at Styal. Children were used because if they werent pay sufficiently they couldnt find time out because they were too miniature. in that observe were no parish apprentices that were adults. A parish apprentice was soul under the hop on of 21 that was learning to work. Living in an apprentice house was hard. The quiescency arrangements were cramped. When the girls went to sleep it were 2 to a bed. There were 60 girls every together in the apprentice house, and in that respect were 30 beds all cramped in one small room.

They had to go up a scat to get to their room. just flat at nights the ladder was go so they were trapped in their room. If they need to go to the seat they had to do it in a bucket. But if you slept next to psyche who wet the bed there would have been a awful smell. They slept on sacks bountiful of wheat and they were only changed once a year. Above the girls room was the attic. Thats were with child(p) behaved girls were direct to solitary confinement. If you want to get a full essay, tell it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper