Theory of recollection from Plato's writings about Socrates

The theory of commemoration, according to Socrates, means that before we are innate(p) we possess all existledge. We are never taught anything new, but quite reminded of things we already know. Socrates deduces this from the argument that the some whiz is immortal, as the soul is immortal, has been natural often and has seen all things here and in the underworld, there is postcode which it has non learned; so it is in no elan surprising that it can recollect things it knew before.... This makes sense if we have a facial expression at Menos Paradox, which tells us that a military man cannot hunt for what he knows - since he knows it, there is no need to pursuit - nor for what he does not know, for he does not know what to look for. This means that we cannot go from a state of not keen (0) to a state of knowing (+1). Then how do we know things? The answer is that we recollect knowledge.

        solely if we do possess knowledge, whether we shoot it before or after we are born, that fact corpse that knowledge still exists and we had to learn it at one point. But as Socrates states in the theory of recollection, our souls already knew all knowledge. in that respect had to be some point in time when our souls did not know anything and were given the chance to learn. This negates both Menos Paradox (because the soul had to go from not knowing to knowing) and the Recollection theory at the same time, for if the soul cannot learn anything, it cannot recollect what it does not know. In another example of why the recollection theory does not work, Socrates inquires a break ones back boy, who had no prior schooling, certain questions round geometry: Tell me now, boy, you know that a square figure is the wish this? Here we can tell that Socrates is indeed controlling the boys answers by asking him a leading question. He does not ask what is this figure, but instead gives the answer within the question. The boy is respond according to how Socrates is asking the question.



Here, we can see that Socrates experiment with the slave boy does not prove this theory.

The argument against the theory of recollection stated above is a good one, if a man doesnt learn new things but merely remembers knowledge from a previous carriage where did he get the knowledge in te previous life or the previous life before that?


Perhaps what Plato/Socrates is arguing is not that propositional knowledge like geometrical theories is being learnt but rather Plato is showing that it is the tycoon to learn geometrical ideas (the capacity for knowledge) that is innate. The ability to do mathematics is something most of us are born with and in one way isnt taught. Although this ability isnt remembered in any sense of the term remember that we use today.

If you want to get a full essay, request it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper